As his subjects were decimated—primarily on account of their own transgressions, despite claims that it was due to the king's wrongdoing—and he fell into deep distress, David preferred to die honorably than to live in shame, having lost his people. If anyone doubts this, let them heed his own words: Your hand shall be upon me, and upon my father’s house (2 Kings 24:17). It was not for the king that the populace suffered, as you might think; rather, it was a rightful reward assigned to each individual, with the subjects facing consequences for sins they had recently committed, and the king for a sin he had just perpetrated. When the incorruptible judgement found the right moment, both the populace and their king received punishment together.
Why be astonished that an entire city suffers for the transgression of a single individual, knowing that this has occurred in the days of David? When a leader becomes arrogant through success, the number of his followers shrinks, resulting in his own sorrow and grief. Yet, they are not punished unjustly; rather, each person receives a fitting reward for their actions, and by declaring judgement against the leader, God’s long-suffering is curtailed. Therefore, do not defend the faults of Eusebius, this self-proclaimed bishop, for if he causes the sanctuary to lose its ministers and the city its citizens, surely he is to blame. Irresponsibly, they have supported the unworthy, dishonoring virtue while allowing such a clear vice to thrive, justly reaping the consequences of their own labors (Psalms 127:2).