John Chrysostom
He was taken away from bonds and judgment because of His profound humility, which silenced Him during the trial, allowing them to completely negate the verdict against Him. Even the most vile and insignificant individuals maintain the right to defend themselves and speak on their behalf. Yet, He chose silence in the court due to His immense humility. The prophet also speaks of the message of the cross and the declaration of miracles. But who can describe His lineage? For He is severed from the realm of the living. Are you speaking of a mere man? If He were only human, why is His birth so hard to trace? This notion is implausible. To prevent any confusion stemming from His deep humility displayed on the cross, the prophet elevates our understanding, revealing His power.
Read more (685 words)
Though He endured immense suffering, He is still separated from the earthly realm. He resides with God, as declared: Ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God (Col. 3:3). He is taken up from the earthly existence. Who can be a man without being born? Let those who slander the prophet’s words feel shame. We should not speak of His eternal birth, as it remains obscure; instead, I refer to the birth that took place in the world. How can a man be born of a Virgin? How can conception happen without physical union? How can a child exist without a husband? Who can truly explain this? Before the two were united, it became evident that she had conceived by the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:18). The act of conception isn’t depicted, rather it is conveyed: The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee; therefore the Holy One to be born shall be called the Son of God (Luke 1:35). Yet, they may insist this is common knowledge. In response to such objections, let us consider: The Holy Spirit will find (Luke 1:35). They assert that the Holy Spirit made this happen. But in what manner did He do so? Was it like God creating Adam? This would be inappropriate. From human seed? Certainly not; to suggest this is profoundly impious. As with Eve—taken from a rib? No. Did He extract anything from her womb and fashion it? I cannot accept that either. But was it not without the Virgin? This is also incorrect; thus, one cannot claim He took flesh from her. How then? I admit my ignorance: I do not know. Do not probe the unfathomable. I affirm that He took flesh from the Virgin, and I affirm it was true flesh. The manner in which He received it from her eludes me; I am not wiser than the prophets or more enlightened than the Holy Spirit who spoke through them. The Spirit, which knows the deep things of God just as a man's spirit understands the things within him (cf. 1 Cor. 2:11), said nothing more than, ‘Who can explain His generation?’ I and you, who are we to search out the unsearchable and delve into the ineffable? If man cannot explain His earthly birth, which was witnessed by countless angels, prophets, and all of creation, being nearly akin to ours since He shared in our humanity in every way except for sin, who would be foolish enough to attempt to grasp the eternal birth that is beyond understanding? He is not of this world; He is severed from the earthly existence. How is this so? His death was certainly not like ours, for His body was not bound by the law of sin, hence He did not face death due to sin but suffered for the transgressions of others. Therefore, God exalted Him (Phil. 2:9). Can you see the grace in suffering for others? Yet one might wonder how we can be assured of this. If His birth remains unspeakable, and if He is distanced from the living, where is He then? The prophet reveals that the hard-hearted may understand that while He died in the flesh, He did not perish in His divine nature. He was not left among the dead but resides with God, as stated: His soul was not left in hell, neither did His flesh see corruption (Acts 2:31), which clearly pertains to His divinity. He died not for His own shortcomings but for the failings of others—bearing a mortal nature, yet not an anxious one. For the sins of My people, He faced execution. Symmachus states: for the iniquities of My people.
Isaiah asked: ‘Who shall declare His generation?’ (Isaiah 53:8). He did not merely ask ‘who shall declare,’ but rather posed it in a way that suggests the impossibility of anyone being able to do so. David reflects: ‘Thy mind is astonished at me’ (Psalms 138:6); and Isaiah proclaims this not only to him but to all humanity; such recognition eludes us all.