All Christian scholars concur that Christ’s command discourages the practice of gossip, criticism, or condemning one’s neighbor for either real or imagined transgressions.
However, Count L. N. Tolstoy challenges this view, asserting that Christ forbade all forms of judgment, including that administered by civil authorities. Given the influence of Tolstoy’s views among educated circles, it is worth examining his perspective. Following the exhortation, "Judge not, lest ye be judged; for with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged" (Matthew 7:2), Christ elaborated: "And why beholdest thou the speck that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" He admonishes hypocrisy and encourages self-examination before addressing the faults of others. This teaching complements the Lord's Prayer, specifically reflecting on "forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors" (Matthew 6:12). Here, Christ emphasizes the necessity of forgiveness among followers, calling them not only to pardon but also to refrain from passing judgment or expressing disapproval toward those who have wronged them.
As per Christ’s instruction, I am called to love my adversary and to act kindly towards him; I must neither retaliate nor harbor anger, but instead, I must forgive all injustices done unto me in exchange for goodwill. If such is my obligation toward a neighbor who has offended me, it stands to reason that finding fault or condemning him has no value. Where judgment and disparagement prevail, genuine forgiveness cannot exist. True forgiveness must be given willingly and wholeheartedly; thus, condemnation and censure are incompatible with forgiveness. "Condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned; forgive, and ye shall be forgiven" (Luke 6:37). This reinforces the understanding that Christ’s admonition against judgment pertains to the censure of others, not to discussions aimed at righteous correction.
To point out a fault should stem not from a place of judgment but from a desire to guide another toward improvement, as articulated in Christ's statement, "and then thou shalt see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye" (Matthew 7:5). It is unjust to criticize the shortcomings of others while overlooking our own. To address another’s failings, one must first remove their own shortcomings, thereby ensuring that the correction offered is devoid of disdain or malice, but rooted in genuine love and support for the other's growth. When confronting a fault, such as adultery, I must approach with compassion rather than animosity; my role as a guide should be constructive, akin to a healer administering restorative care.
"Judge not, lest ye be judged; for by what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." The wisdom of Augustine acknowledges the flaw in assuming that wrongful judgments among us will prompt a false divine judgment, as our own injustices will be met with God's righteous scrutiny. David proclaims in his psalm (Psalm 17:26-27) that the measure of divine judgment reflects the degree of human wickedness, emphasizing accountability without contradiction.
The fault of neighborly condemnation is ubiquitous, characterized by a troubling blindness that often overlooks one’s own imperfections while magnifying the faults of others. In cautioning us against such behavior, Christ reiterates: "Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven" (Luke 6:37). During the somber days of Lent, the Orthodox Church implores: "Lord, let me see my own transgressions and not condemn my brother!" This plea underscores the need for self-awareness among those inclined to speak ill of others.
Count L. N. Tolstoy, in his essay "What is my faith?" contends that the directive "do not judge, do not condemn" transcends mere verbal admonitions against our neighbors’ shortcomings; he implies it also applies to judicial actions. He bases his view partly on the translation of Greek words krino and katadikazo, asserting they denote condemnation in a penal sense, and partly on early interpretations emphasizing non-condemnation by the early Church. Moreover, he suggests that courts uphold a system that retaliates against wrongdoing, contrary to Christ's teachings of forgiveness and non-retaliation.
However, the Greek term krino, as used by the Evangelists, has a multifaceted meaning, including discernment and judgment, not exclusively condemning punishment. This is further substantiated in John’s Gospel where Christ states, "You judge according to the flesh; I judge no man...I have much to say and judge of you" (John 8:15, 26), indicating that when He speaks of judgment, it may simply refer to discerning actions rather than condemning them. Similarly, in the parables and teachings attributed to Him, the context often hints towards guiding dialogue rather than punitive measures.
As Thomas Aquinas states, the essence of judgment is not merely punitive; it must incorporate the nature of justice. The Church acknowledges this balance through the call for mercy in judgment, a principle established by Christ. It stands to reason that if Christ Himself did not reject the role of civic authorities in enacting justice, we must reconcile the call for mercy with the existence of corrective measures within a community.
Indeed, the administration of justice becomes a crucial aspect of societal living, intertwined with mercy rather than vengeance. While Christ urges personal forgiveness, judicial structures serve a purpose in maintaining order, administering fairness for the greater good. We must remember that loving our enemy does not entail enabling continued wrongdoing. True love seeks correction, guiding the wicked back toward virtue through understanding and compassion.
Thus, we conclude that Christ's call to "judge not" reproaches the sinful tendency to condemn, not the necessity of administering justice or addressing another’s faults from a place of love and restoration. The challenge for each follower of Christ is to embody a spirit of forgiveness and humility while grappling with the complexities of human behavior and societal norms.