‘O God, I will sing a new song unto Thee; in the psalter of ten strings I will sing unto Thee, who giveth salvation unto kings.’ It is important to observe that David does not refer to ‘the king,’ meaning not only himself, but to kings in general, which signifies God’s favor upon royal authority.
Even more noteworthy is the song of the prophetess Anna, who, in her prayer of gratitude to God for granting her a son, Samuel, became enveloped in prophetic exaltation. ‘Anna prayed and spoke,’ expressing the miraculous workings of God's Providence both in her prayer and her prophetic vision: “He will strengthen our kings and exalt the horn of His Anointed One.” (1 Sam. 2:1-10). We must remember that later, during the time of Annas' son, God indeed blessed the Jewish people with kings. Though the Hebrews had yet to see kings, the prophetess had already invoked and prophesied God’s guardianship over their future monarchs. The God-inspired people held in high regard the royal dignity for the benefit of God's chosen nation! Thus, the true Church, both ancient and contemporary, consistently upholds the truth that is beneficial for humanity and its own self!
But what does it imply when the Prophet speaks of a ‘new’ song concerning the salvation of kings, when it should not be the first? We ought to consider that the new royal circumstances, deliverance from emerging threats, the triumph over fresh trials, and the continued guidance that God has revealed to the king inspired new reflections in the heart of the Psalmist, invoking new emotions and fresh notes in the ten-stringed psalter—a new song in prayer for the monarchy. We ourselves, in grateful remembrance of the day when ‘God raised up one chosen from His people’ and entrusted us with our devout Autocrat, do not present a new prayer but an everlasting one: yet in light of new events, our hearts swell with gratitude for the King who grants salvation. For over thirty years, guiding the vast kingdom with steady hands, He has faced numerous royal experiences, numerous victories, and many challenges, all while being sustained by God’s protection: however, the past year brought forth a unique trial of royal spirit and wisdom.
In the countries closely allied with Russia, and among various neighboring peoples, amidst the inertia of governments, from the depths of secret, immoral reserves, a tempest of rebellion and chaos erupted, shaking and dismantling the order of one kingdom after another, jeopardizing the peace and security of all nations in Europe: and especially directed hostility towards Russia as the steadfast defender of rightful authority, order, and peace. Here we can echo Devvoroy: ‘great trials of the heart’! (Judg. 5:16)! It was challenging to maintain patience, and it was difficult to suppress zeal. Remaining idle brought the risk of escalating the impudence of those who oppose peace; yet taking action risked provoking those seeking an opportunity for conflict. ‘Great trials of the heart.’ But the heart of the Tsar remained steadfast in the Lord, unaffected by difficulties. The most pious Emperor, with characteristic openness, communicated His royal intentions to His people regarding the unsettling movements outside of Russia that could potentially reach its borders, reaffirming His unwavering commitment to uphold peace and, if needed, to defend against the adversaries of tranquility.
In a prudent repositioning of military strength towards the threatened borders, while maintaining a posture of peace, He created a stance of deterrence: thus morally fortifying the faithful allies and defenders of order and peace, while repelling rebellion and irreligion from a distance. If some neighboring monarchs waged decisive resistance against lawlessness that boldly manifested itself in all its destructiveness—this, undeniably, was greatly supported by the robust bastion of autocracy and legitimate authority represented by Russia. Therefore, is it not remarkable that the Sovereign of Russia, with the sweep of his scepter, acts with as much might as if with arms, maintaining peace while quelling one of the most hostile forces, silencing fiery rhetoric into majestic quietude? The year of anxiety and dread for many nations remained a year of tranquility and peace.
O God, we sing a new song to You, who grants salvation to the King! I turn again to the Jewish psalmist, eager to delve deeper into what circumstances inspired him to compose a new song for the salvation of kings. I see the resolution to this inquiry within the psalm itself. The Psalmist appeals to God: ‘Rescue me from many waters, from the hands of foreign sons; their mouths speak emptiness, and their right hands are deceitful’ (Psalm 143:7-8). Consequently, he proclaims: ‘O God, I will sing a new song unto Thee, who giveth salvation unto kings.’
To comprehend this abrupt shift from a sorrowful plea to a triumphant proclamation, it is essential to recognize that the Psalmist perceives a great peril in those whose mouths are filled with emptiness and whose right hands are unjust. Hence, he sees rescue from such beings as a profound act of divine grace, worthy of solemn thanksgiving. It is unquestionable that the proliferation of individuals whose right hands are marred by deceit is detrimental and perilous, not only for individuals but for society as a whole. But are not those who ‘speak emptiness’ equally dangerous? Are there many mouths that are so restrained that they never utter futility? To explore this adequately, we must avoid a superficial assessment of emptiness. Solomon devoted an entire book to this subject: yet we need only consider the beginning and the end of his reflections. At the start, he declares, ‘All is vanity’ (Ecclesiastes 1:2); and at the conclusion, he urges, ‘Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole duty of man’ (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
By synthesizing these insights, we find that Solomon teaches that genuine elevation above vanity lies in the fear of God and adherence to His commandments; conversely, outside this reverence, all human pursuits are vanity. Thus, the ‘mouth that speaks emptiness,’ which the Psalmist regards with dread, signifies a burgeoning philosophy devoid of respect for God and His statutes. ‘Deliver me,’ he implores, “from many waters, from the hands of foreign sons, whose mouths speak vanity” (Psalm 143:7-8).
A divinely inspired individual cannot be accused of futile fear or cowardice. Yet if the perils of vanity he identified are truly acknowledged, should we not be cautious if we witness, hear, and perhaps even permit such vanity to flourish? In our current times, are we not witnessing the multiplication of voices that utter emptiness, neglecting God and His commandments? Do they not often speak freely, enticingly, in conversations, public spectacles, and literary works? The root of vanity emerges from a decline in devotion to the Divine and spiritual matters, countered by an inclination toward sensual indulgence; individuals become enamored with superficialities, pursuing pleasure while growing indifferent to the true and righteous.
However, that which is divine, spiritual, and good is eternal and thus resonates with the immortal soul of humanity, providing lasting satisfaction; while the sensual is transient and ultimately unfulfilling to the everlasting spirit. Superficial joys, devoid of substance from true goodness, are fleeting and lose their allure with repetition, leading to an incessant craving for novelty; unchecked passions, when stripped of the guidance of reason and moral understanding, can evolve into reckless pursuits: the realm of vanity, once invigorated, cannot confine itself to mere distractions, but invariably advances with greater fervor and scope.
Where does this lead us? Unfortunately, the trajectory is painfully apparent in our interactions with the ‘sons of strangers.’ Their myriad ‘mouths that speak vanity,’ begin with innocent pleasantries, evolve to immodest remarks, progress to seductive expressions, and ultimately devolve into unashamedly destructive rhetoric; this stirs minds and underscores the sentiment: ‘their right hand is the hand of unrighteousness,’ summoning forth, as the Psalmist articulates, “many waters”—a deluge of evil that undermines the very foundations of societal stability and virtue.
However, are we vigilant? Do we not occasionally allow their frivolities to infiltrate our own lives, creeping in unnoticed? Perhaps they argue that we borrow only harmless vanity from them. I shall refrain from contesting this notion, though it is worth questioning whether any form of vanity can be deemed innocent before the standards of truth and virtue. What I declare is that when we permit what is categorized as ‘innocent’ vanity to enter, we must exercise the utmost caution to prevent more harmful forms from taking root.
Let us express our gratitude to God and the Most Pious Sovereign whom He upholds, for the protection from ‘many waters’ and from ‘the sons of strangers, whose mouths speak vanity and whose right hands are given to unrighteousness!’ May we strive, on our part, to remain worthy of the highest safeguarding! The remedy for this is simple and certain, that which Solomon recommended and our forebears faithfully passed down to us: ‘Fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the duty of every person.’ Within this lies the essence, goodness, and blessedness of humanity. Amen.